A vaccine against serogroup B meningococcal disease: from the laboratory to clinical trials

A vaccine against serogroup B meningococcal disease: from the laboratory to clinical trials

Professor Andrew Pollard, University of Oxford

Working with Professor Maiden from the University of Oxford, Professor Feavers at the National Institute of Biological Standards and Control, and Dr Derrick from the University of Manchester, Dr Pollard aimed to find a suitable vaccine to protect against the most common strain of meningococcal bacteria currently in the UK - Meningitis B (MenB).

Watch a video of Professor Pollard talking about his project

The Meningitis C (MenC) vaccine is useful in protecting children from disease caused by the bacterium Neisseria meningitidis type C. However, the most common strain in the UK is Neisseria meningitidis type B (MenB), against which there is no vaccine. Scientists have been trying to make a MenB vaccine from some of the molecules found on the bacterial surface, but their efforts have been hampered by the variability of these molecules between the different MenB strains.

In a previous study, Professor Pollard and colleagues identified an outer-membrane protein called ‘Opa’. This protein has limited variability, which suggested that it might be a good vaccine candidate.

The team manufactured ‘Opa’ proteins, which were able to stimulate the production of antibodies that could kill group B meningococcal bacteria. This was a significant breakthrough as previous vaccine candidates have been unable to do this.

Limited studies concerned with the safety of Opa proteins in vaccines have been carried out in the past, but data are scarce and most work has focused on the Opa proteins of the related bacterium, Neisseria gonorrhoeae rather than MenB. Consequently, more research was needed in this area.

Opa protein

The research team aimed to evaluate the suitability of using Opa proteins to create a vaccine, and to address vital questions about how these proteins affect our immune cells. This project sought to address important safety questions that needed to be answered before phase 1 clinical trials could start.

Identification of a suitable vaccine candidate, which is consistent between different strains of Meningitis B (MenB), may lead to an effective vaccine to protect future generations against MenB infection.

This project is now complete - see the outcomes tab for more information.

This study aimed to investigate a collection of proteins found on the surface of the meningococcus called Opa (opacity) proteins as potential vaccine candidates. Opa is one protein used by the meningococcus to stick to cells lining the back of the throat of humans. A vaccine that targets this protein could conceivably protect people by preventing meningococci from sticking to the lining of the throat and like other vaccines, it would also generate antibodies that would kill the bacterium if it invaded the bloodstream.

In the first part of their study, the team has found that Opa proteins have limited variability in different families of Meningitis B and so produced Opa proteins in the laboratory and used them as experimental vaccines to make antibodies. They found that these antibodies could kill the target meningococcus in the laboratory test that mimics the way in which humans kill the bacteria, but only when the target Opa protein was expressed by the organism.

Thus, Opa appears to show promise as a vaccine candidate, but a study published from a research group in Canada raised a doubt, in arguing that Opa protein could inhibit the function of special human white cells called T-cells, which are critical for immune responses to infection and for enhancing vaccine responses. These Canadian findings needed to be investigated before proposing that Opa be used in phase I clinical trials in humans. Andrew Pollard’s collaborative team then set out to see what effect Opa had on T-cell function and concluded from their set of experiments that purified and natural and non-natural Opa proteins had neither a consistent stimulatory or inhibitory influence on T-cell function. This suggested to the team that any response to Opa in a vaccine should not impact on the development of an immune response in humans.

The data are an important addition to the literature on Opa proteins and particularly that the proteins not only elicit antibodies that kill meningococci but also do not compromise immune responses in humans. Thus, there is no reason to exclude them from candidate MenB vaccines.

A vaccine against serogroup B meningococcal disease: from the laboratory to clinical trials

A protein vaccine against serogroup B meningococcal disease: from proof in principle to phase I clinical trials

Professor Andrew Pollard, University of Oxford

Working with Professor Maiden from the University of Oxford, Professor Feavers at the National Institute of Biological Standards and Control, and Dr Derrick from the University of Manchester, Dr Pollard aimed to find a suitable vaccine to protect against the most common strain of meningococcal bacteria currently in the UK - Meningitis B (MenB).

Watch a video of Professor Pollard talking about his project

Comprehensive prevention of meningococcal disease has not been possible due to the lack of a vaccine against organisms associated with the serogroup B capsular polysaccharide. Most global serogroup B disease is caused by just four hyperinvasive genetic groups (the ST-8, ST-11, ST-32 and ST-44 clonal complexes). It was established that these complexes are stably associated with combinations of highly immunogenic Opacity associated (Opa) surface proteins involved in colonisation and invasion of human tissues. 

In a Meningitis UK funded project, optimisation of the expression and purification of several Opa protein variants has taken place. ‘Proof in principle’ has now been achieved that combinations of Opa proteins specific to hyperinvasive genotypes elicit high titres of bactericidal antibody in mice.

Opa protein

To address critical safety and efficacy questions, the current study aimed:

1) to complete extensive characterisation of the murine immune response against the current panel of purified, refolded recombinant Opa proteins as originally funded by Meningitis UK.

2) to systematically investigate the immunomodulatory effects of Opa proteins on proliferation of native human B cells and CD4+ T-cells, on the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines from human macrophages and CD4+ T-cells and on the secretion of antibody from B cells.

3) to evaluate the vaccine candidacy of non-native forms of Opa proteins (unfolded recombinant proteins and in vitro manufactured peptides), which could be more advantageous in manufacture and regulation, and to explore their effects on aspects of cellular immunology.

This project is now complete - see the outcomes tab for more information.

Aim 1 – To complete extensive characterisation of the murine immune response against current panel of purified, refolded recombinant Opa proteins as originally funded by Meningitis UK.

Functional bactericidal antibody titres in immunised versus non-immunised sera against different clonal complexes of meningococci have been performed using the SBA evaluation method. Immunisation with refolded recombinant Opa proteins (rOpaA and rOpaD) elicited bactericidal antibodies against the target N. meningitidis strains only when the target protein was expressed. Other laboratory techniques such as Dot blotting, Western blotting and whole cell ELISA have also been used to measure the level and breadth of antibody responses against rOpa proteins. The characterisation of the murine immune response against recombinant Opa proteins has been completed, providing compelling proof in principle for the development of an Opa-based meningococcal vaccine.

Aim 2 – To systematically investigate the immunomodulatory effects of Opa proteins on proliferation of native human B cells and CD4+ T-cells, on the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines from human macrophages and CD4+ T-cells and on the secretion of antibody from B cells.

There are conflicting data in the literature regarding the effect of Opa proteins on CD4+ T-cell proliferation. Through the establishment of several academic collaborations during this project, the team were able to perform experiments using identical reagents to those previously published allowing them to directly compare the results from this study with those in the literature. In contrast to the data presented by Boulton and Gray-Owen (2002)[1] and Lee et al (2007)[2], in these experiments purified recombinant Opa proteins and Opa containing liposomes revealed no consistent stimulatory/inhibitory influence on CD4+ T-cell proliferation or IFN-gamma cytokine production. Inhibition of T-cell proliferation was evident upon co-culture with liposomes containing OpaD although no effect was seen with the purified rOpaD. These experiments were performed on a limited number of individuals (13 participants) and will be extended for publication with several different batches of recombinant protein and new liposome preparations. The team will also investigate whether liposomal aggregation in this particular IOpaD stock preparation was responsible for the results that were obtained.

The data are in line with a publication by van der Ley and Virji in 2009[3], who showed that Opa-/Opa+ OMVs and Opa-/Opa+ meningococci/gonococci induce sustained proliferative responses in CD4+ T-cells. There was no consistent effect of any of the Opa antigens on CD4+ T-cell proliferation which suggests that these cells were able to divide and expand in number following contact with Opa antigens. Antibody production from B cells was also studied but no Opa-mediated inhibition or stimulation was found. No inhibitory effects of Opa proteins were discovered using ex vivo T-cells, which is the standard method of vaccine evaluation. This suggests that any response to an Opa based vaccine should not impact on the development of the immune response. The majority of antigens did not cause a significant response in the healthy volunteers that were studied.

The data provide no evidence that Opa should be excluded from future meningococcal vaccine formulations as they may not necessarily inhibit T-cell function. However, the responses to the Opa antigen panel varied between individuals and this should be taken into consideration when optimising the final vaccine formulation.

Aim 3 – To evaluate the vaccine candidacy of non-native forms of Opa proteins (unfolded recombinant proteins and in vitro manufactured peptides) which could be more advantageous in manufacture and regulation and to explore their effects on aspects of cellular immunology.

In the first year of the study a panel of mutated Opa proteins (non-native) were successfully manufactured. In the second and final year of the study the team evaluated the vaccine candidacy of several non-native forms of Opa protein including unfolded forms of rOpaA and rOpaD (which was achieved using protein denaturing conditions), folded forms of rOpaA mutant and rOpaD mutant proteins and in vitro manufactured Opa peptides. The immunomodulatory effects of non-native forms of Opa were investigated upon co-culture with human PBMCs and CD4+ T-cells.

Immunisation with rOpaD mutant protein elicited SBA titres of 1:256 against target strains expressing this particular Opa protein, however, the rOpaA mutant protein elicited a lower titre against the OpaAD+ target strain compared to the native rOpaA protein. Preliminary results using these protein preparations did not indicate any non-native Opa-mediated effects on T-cell proliferation, T-cell cytokine production or B cell antibody production under the culture conditions studied. This series of experiments was performed with samples from a limited number of study participants and will therefore be extended and included in any future publication.

Immunisation with Opa peptides did not elicit bactericidal antibodies in mice therefore priority for the immunomodulatory assays was given to the protein panel described above. At present, there is no murine SBA data to present for the denatured native and non-native forms of rOpaA and rOpaD but the team hope to determine these titres within the next few months.

Since several of the native and non-native forms of Opa proteins did not influence a number of studied immunomodulatory functions these non-native antigens would be advantageous in the manufacturing of a vaccine formulation.



[1] Boulton IC and Gray-Owen SD (2002) Neisserial binding to CEACAM1 arrests the activation and proliferation of CD4+ T lymphocytes. Nature Immunology 3(3): 229-236

[2] Lee HSW, Boulton IC, Redding K, Wong H, Halliwell D, Mandelboim O, Gorringe AR, Gray-Owen SD Neisserial outer membrane vesicles bind the coinhibitory receptor carcinoembryonic antigen-related cellular adhesion molecule 1 and supress CD4+ T lymphocyte function. Infection and Immunity 75(9): 4449-4455

[3] Youssef AR, van der Flier M, Estevao S, Hartwig NG, van der Ley P, Virji M. Opa+ and Opa- isolates of Neisseria meningitidis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae induce sustained proliferative responses in human CD4+ T cells. Infection and Immunity 77(11): 5170-5180

 

Did you know?

Words with dotted underlining can be found in our medical glossary, hover over them for a summary or click to go to the full description.

Association of Medical Research Charities Fundraising Standards Board Confederation of Meningitis Organisations Pneumococcal Awareness Council of Experts

MeningitisUK is the working name of Spencer Dayman MeningitisUK · Registered Charity No.1076774

© 2009 Spencer Dayman MeningitisUK · Terms & Conditions · Privacy Policy · Site Map
Meningitis Prevention · Meningitis Fund Raising · Meningitis Symptoms · Viral Meningitis · XML